|
|
Risk |
Issues |
Probability of accident |
Likely severity |
Risk estimation |
Control measures |
|
1 |
Novice and inexperienced coxes.
Lack of adherence to marshalling instructions (e.g at end of ladies’ race) |
· Coxswains fail to attend coxswains’ pre-race meeting
· [Refer to issues set out in TRRC report on Dovehouse Pier incident in 2006] |
Likely |
Slight harm |
Medium
7 |
· UHBC sets basic minimum coxing experience criteria (min 30 outings);
· attendance register at coxes meeting;
· Coxswains and crews in general have had most of academic year to gain experience;
· UHBC places emphasis on responsibilities of individual club captains to ensure compliance with marshalling instructions and attendance at coxswains’ meeting.
· Ensure marshalling launches in correct position throughout marshalling and race. |
|
2 |
Radio communication failure |
· Radio dead spot at head position.
· Handset failure. |
Unlikely |
Slight harm |
Low
4 |
· Mobile phones as back-up
· Launch 3 to keep out of dead spot
· Direct contact (mobile telephone back-up) between L3, BM9 & BM10. |
|
3 |
Inadequate launch availability |
· Borrowed launches.
· Engine failure. |
Unlikely |
Slight
Harm |
Low
4 |
· Minimum 10 functioning launches available at start of race
· Reserve launch on standby at ULBH |
|
4 |
Inadequate launch safety equipment |
· Borrowed equipment |
Very unlikely |
Moderate Harm |
Low
2 |
· Minimum 10 fully equipped launches at start of race;
· Launch 9 designated safety launch;
· UHBC to identify responsibility of individual club captains to provide equipment in line with British Rowing Row Safe |
|
5 |
Medical facilities |
· Medical cover.
· First aid kit. |
Very unlikely |
Extreme Harm |
Low
3 |
· President and Vice-presidents medically qualified;
· Basic medical equipment provision, including oxygen |
|
6 |
Medical evacuation |
· Difficulty for LAS ambulance to gain access.
· Remoteness from primary evacuation route. |
Very unlikely |
Extreme Harm |
Low
3 |
· LAS outside of UHBC control
· Designated primary evacuation route via ULBH
· Secondary routes via Kew or TSSC (road);
· Syon or UWBH (air).
· BM10 to co-ordinate primary evacuation or designate secondary co-ordinator. |
|
7 |
Watermanship of competitors proceeding to marshalling area |
· Failure of cox to keep adequate look-out
· Inexperience of coxes
·Failure to adhere to CPRT
·Congestion up to crossing point |
Likely |
Slight harm |
Medium
7 |
· See 1 above;
· Supervision by 10 launches;
· Pre-race information to coxes
· Provision of Port-hand buoys appears to help control risk by identifying correct navigation channel;
· Launch 4 to control traffic build up towards crossing point. |
|
8 |
Watermanship of competitors and external crews at revised crossing (PLA notice to mariners) |
· Crews attempting to cross too early
· Crews failing to observe correct crossing point
· External crews deliberately ignoring instructions
· Navigation behind PLA moorings (note wooden post – new for 2008) |
Likely |
Slight harm |
Medium
7 |
· Crossing supervision by launches 3 and 4; PLA mooring supervision by launch 2 (wooden post new for 2008);
· Pre-race information to coxes about wooden post (new for 2008);
· PLA notice to mariners;
· UHBC written/e-mail notification to other local clubs;
· Warning to those deliberately ignoring instructions that report will be made to PLA/TRRC/own club |
|
9 |
Supervision of marshalling areas |
· Failure to adhere to temporary navigation rules set out in PLA NTM 2010U1
· Crews rowing at firm pressure in congested area
· Too many boats in marshalling area between crossing and PLA moorings
· Navigation behind PLA moorings (note wooden post) |
Likely |
Slight harm |
Medium
7 |
· 3 launches in marshalling area;
· Pre-race instruction to coxes;
· Launch 2 to check depth for navigation behind PLA moorings if necessary and assess impact of wooden post (sufficient room between post and mooring for an VIII);
· No firm pressure / racing starts in marshalling area;
· Launches 3 and 4 to hold crews below crossing if excess congestion.
|
|
10 |
Turning of competitors onto the stream |
· Novice coxes
· Failure of cox to keep adequate look-out
· Failure of cox to get boat into correct in-shore area as a result of the turn
· Failure of marshalling launch to supervise turning |
Likely |
Slight
harm |
Medium
7 |
· Adequate supervision by marshalling launches 1 & 2;
· Pre-race information to coxes;
· Club captains to ensure proficiency of novice coxes |
|
11 |
Landing at the start |
· Landing with the stream |
Unlikely |
Slight harm |
Low
4 |
· Coxes to practice landing with stream; pre-race information to coxes
· Launches 1 & 2 to supervise second attempts. |
|
12 |
Start sequence |
· Unobserved obstruction on course
· Pleasure cruiser on course
· Delay whilst waiting for powered vessels coming upriver (particularly likely at weekend)
· Non-compliant external crew
|
Unlikely |
Moderate harm |
Medium
5 |
· Chief umpire in charge of start sequence;
· wait or abort start up to last few seconds if necessary if powered vessel/pleasure cruiser or non-compliant external crew on course;
· Chief umpire to visually check whole of marshalling area and telephone/radio check with PLA Richmond Lock and BM 9 prior to starting sequence;
|
|
13 |
Injury to stakers |
· From blades of own boat or next boat
· Inattention just after start
· May go too deep into water |
Unlikely |
Moderate harm |
Medium
5 |
· Stakers to go no further in than waist height; emphasis at coxes and marshals meetings.
· Must stand back and keep a good lookout. |
|
14 |
Race start and course |
· Coxes’ attention drawn away from proper watermanship
· Failure to keep adequate look-out
· Failure to adhere promptly to PLA byelaws (2006/U15) & CPRT
· Conflict with motor vessels (especially on Saturday)
· Difficulty in communication between marshals and coxes |
Likely |
Slight
Harm
(usually no conflict)
|
Medium
7 |
· Pre-race information to coxes;
· Ensure all coxes have key minimum competencies as assessed by club captains; specific requirement on all club captains to disclose problems with competency at previous UHBC committee meeting
· Launch 3 (JM) will attempt to delay race start to avoid possible conflict in kew RZs with oncoming powered vessels
· Launch provided for escorting powered vessels (launch 10), duties shared with launch 8 if large number of powered vessels
· Launches equipped with adequate megaphone and flags;
|
|
15 |
Navigation in Kew Restricted Zone |
· Variation of standard rules set out in PLA NTM 2006/U15 by specific event NTM 2010/U1 – failure of coxes to adhere to changed rules
· Potential narrowing of channel in RZ’s by oncoming powered vessels |
Likely |
Slight harm |
Medium
7
(based on 2007 event) |
· Overtaking in Kew RZs only when safe (coxes’ meeting)
· Launch marshals 5 & 6 (led by launch 5) have power to enforce ’line astern’ racing if conditions not safe (e.g. oncoming powered vessel)
· Launch 10 to provide escort of powered vessel upriver (shared with launch 8 if excessive number of powered vessels)
|
|
16 |
Bumping |
· Physical contact possible
· Possibility of personal injury - Inadequate bowball and/or foot restraints
· Despondancy in losing crew; failure to keep an adequate lookout;
· Difficulty where channel narrowed (PLA moorings, Brentford Ait, Oliver’s Eyot)
· Effect of PLA Restricted Zones at Kew (NTM 2006/U15)
· Failure of crews to disengage promptly and likelihood of obstruction of fairway (especially in Kew RZs) |
Likely |
Slight
harm
(based on UHBC experience; although possibility of equipment damage) |
Medium
7 |
· Encourage early acknowledgement of bump to avoid physical contact of any sort (coxes’ meeting);
· Marshals to inspect bowballs and adequacy of foot restraints of boats rowing in event (British Rowing rules of racing) (BM8);
· Marshals to target narrow channel areas (especially PLA moorings - launches 2 & 3);
· Specific terms of NTM to permit overtaking in Kew RZs
· Other rules of RZs not varied – to emphasise at coxes’ and marshals meetings
· Possible need for launch marshals 5 & 6 to order ‘line astern’; revised bumping rules in this case in the Kew RZs (no overtaking, no technical bumps etc) – coxes’ meeting;
· Losing (leading) cox must always move first to disentangle the bump – especially in the Kew RZs;
· Crews must only stop in two designated areas on Surrey side of fairway (before and after Kew RZs), without obstructing either the fairway or the Surrey inshore zone (emphasis at coxes’ meeting) – launches 5,6,7,8 & 10 |
|
17 |
Race finish and turning |
· Failure to keep an adequate lookout
· Failure to comply with CPRT
· Potential obstruction of Surrey inshore zone (especially ladies’ crews turning after ULBH)
· Failure to comply with requirements of Chiswick Bridge RZ (NTM 2006/U15) – men’s race |
Likely |
Slight harm |
Medium
7 |
· Marshalling launches 7,8 & 10 to ensure boats able to turn safely away from bridges and RZs;
· Procedure for turning in pre-race information to coxes (coxes’ meeting); including discussion about Chiswick Bridge RZ
|
|
18 |
Watermanship of returning crews |
· Failure to adhere to CPRT, especially in Surrey in-shore zone;
· Failure to give way to vessels on fairway when crossing back to ULBH |
Unlikely |
Slight
harm |
Low
4 |
· Navigation back to ULBH in coxes’ meeting, launch 7 to supervise crossing of crews back to ULBH (assisted by other launches as available) at water outfall. |